A top doctor has just explained why Donald Trump constantly behaves like a toddler

 


A top psychiatrist has issued a chilling new warning over Donald Trump's mental state, comparing the US President's recent outbursts to a "helpless toddler". Dr Bandy Lee, a forensic and social psychiatrist who previously taught at Harvard and Yale, claimed the 80-year-old leader is becoming increasingly "unstable" as public scrutiny grows over his age and health.

Her damming assessment comes after the president faced fierce backlash for falsely claiming firefighters had to carry him away from Ground Zero shortly after the 9/11 terror attacks. Mr Trump later backtracked on Truth Social, admitting he was not there on the day of the collapse, but insisted his statements were "exactly accurate". Dr Lee argued that the bizarre tall tale points to a deeper psychological issue.

"The degree to which he needs to do that for every significant event in national history... all of this goes back to just how fragile he is in his sense of self, Dr Lee said, speaking to MeidasTouch. "This is normally what toddlers do. They have to be king or queen or ruler of the universe in order to fight the feeling that they are quite helpless and dependent on others' care.

"But of course that's normal for a two or three-year-old. It is abnormal and pathological when it involves a fully grown adult."

Dr Lee - who edited the 2017 book The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump and joined 35 other medical professionals in calling for his removal under the 25th Amendment - also raised alarms over Mr Trump's erratic social media posts, including memes depicting him launching nuclear weapons.



She warned: "The extremely dangerous situation in which we find ourselves is that... there's no way to countermand the command of a nuclear weapon.

"[He is] an incredibly mentally unstable individual who's become far more unstable with time, with more power he's given and the less he is constrained."

The psychiatrist's outburst comes amid mounting public interest in the President's physical and cognitive state, sparked by recent instances of daytime drowsiness, hand bruising, and swollen ankles. A recent YouGov poll revealed 48% of Americans believe their leader has suffered a modest or significant mental or physical decline.

However, the White House has hit back furiously at the claims, accusing critics of political bias. White House spokesman Davis Ingle declared, "If it quacks like a duck, it may actually just be a Democrat hack doctor [...] President Trump is the sharpest, most accessible, and energetic president in American history and any so-called medical professionals engaging in armchair diagnosis or false speculation for political purposes are clearly breaking the Hippocratic Oath they've sworn to."



Officials attributed the bruising on Mr Trump's hands to frequent handshaking and stated his ankle swelling was caused by chronic venous insufficiency. The president himself has repeatedly insisted he remains in peak condition, boasting following a recent physical that "everything" had "checked out PERFECTLY".

America stopped trusting vaccines. Now the diseases are back

 America stopped trusting vaccines. Now the diseases are back



Among a certain subset of Americans, the most honoured adjective these days is “crunchy”. Crunchy moms and dads have strict rules for raising a family. Toys must be wooden (no microplastics, please). Beef must be grass-fed. Veggies, organic. Eggs, cage-free. Nappies, cloth – no paper. Only “raw milk” of course; none of that pasteurised stuff. And for the crunchy set, vaccines, including the preventive jabs that have been given to American children for decades, should be avoided, even if it means the kids are left vulnerable to disease. Opposition to childhood vaccines – the anti-vax movement, in common parlance – has become so widespread that the US is now experiencing significant outbreaks of preventable maladies like mumps, measles and whooping cough that were rare, or officially eliminated, a few years ago. The result has been a spurt in absenteeism in some school districts, not only because of children who are sick but also because parents are afraid to have their healthy offspring mingle with contagious classmates. “The costs of that absenteeism are just not among the sick kids, but all the kids who are kept out of school as a precaution,” notes Dr Thomas Dee, of Stanford University’s School of Education.

One of the wildest U-turns in recent political history



The reigning hero of Crunchy America is the outspoken anti-vaxxer Robert F Kennedy Jr, the US Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) – a position that roughly matches Britain’s Health Secretary. Running the nation’s health department would seem an unlikely job for a vaccine critic (though Kennedy disputes that he is anti-vaccine). To land that spot in Donald Trump’s administration, he pulled off one of the wildest U-turns in recent political history. A scion of America’s most prominent Democratic family, the son and namesake of a liberal hero, Kennedy Jr ran for president in 2024 as a ferocious critic of the Republican candidate, Trump. But late in the campaign, when it became clear that Trump was likely to win, Kennedy abruptly reversed course. Ending his own campaign, RFK Jr overnight became a full-fledged champion of Trump and his Make America Great Again movement. In a tribute to Maga, Kennedy calls his crunchy effort “Make America Healthy Again” (Maha). It was as if Euan Blair suddenly showed up as a Reform candidate and started praising Nigel Farage. Kennedy’s flip-flop was rewarded. He was given the health portfolio in Trump’s government, even though most of the medical and public health establishment opposed him. Some of Trump’s fellow Republicans in the US Senate, concerned about Kennedy’s anti-vaccine activism, were reluctant to confirm his nomination to be HHS Secretary. To win their votes, those senators said, Kennedy promised that he would not mess with America’s existing vaccine regime. But then he did.

Vaccination rates have fallen even more since Trump’s second term began



Once in office, Kennedy fired all the members of the government’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which traditionally urged parents to get their kids vaccinated. He stacked the committee with fellow vaccine doubters and encouraged them to probe the “safety” of childhood vaccines. The Advisory Committee began issuing scary warnings about some widely-used shots. In August, with Kennedy applauding at his side, Trump issued an executive order that cuts the number of childhood vaccines recommended by the federal government from 17 to 11. Parents can still get the other six shots for their kids, but at significant cost; health insurance policies generally don’t cover vaccines lacking the federal recommendation. The cost could run into hundreds of dollars per child. And Trump proposed that the standard MMR vaccine, given to one-year-olds to prevent measles, mumps and rubella, should be divided into three separate shots, meaning at least three trips to the doctor’s office – in a country where people have to pay out of pocket for most visits. This anti-vaccine alarm runs counter to decades of studies showing the jabs to be safe and effective. But the anti-vaxxers have had an impact. The number of American children getting the shots has been declining for several years; vaccination rates have fallen even more since Trump’s second term began. Meanwhile, the US has seen a spike in contagious diseases that were sharply controlled before, including influenza and Covid-19.

Reflects a broader distrust of science



In 2020, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention recorded 13 cases of measles in the entire country. Nine months into 2026, the number for the year is more than 3,470. “And it’s only September,” notes Dr Paul Offit, of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “This is going to get much worse with colder weather… The message should be, ‘Let’s get our kids vaccinated.’ But you never hear that from the Secretary of HHS.” The fear of vaccines reflects a broader distrust of science, the food industry and the big drug companies among the crunchy segment of the population and some political conservatives. The concerns are not new, but they have become more common because of the widespread anger over government demands for school closures and mask-wearing during the Covid pandemic. The national “Measles Tracker” maintained by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health shows that vaccine refusal, and the resulting outbreaks of the disease, tend to blossom in certain communities and religious groups.

Vaccine refusal in 'crunchy' communities



Upscale neighbourhoods that house the “crunchy” – places like Boulder, Colorado and Austin, Texas – fall below the recommended immunisation rates because of vaccine resistance. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, with a large Amish population (“the Pennsylvania Dutch”, they’re called) has kindergarten vaccination rates considerably below the 95 per cent considered necessary to preserve “herd immunity”. In Spartanburg, South Carolina, home to many Eastern European immigrants, Slavic Christians have invoked the state’s “religious exemption” to avoid vaccinating their kids – and measles cases have surged dramatically. Mennonite communities in Texas and Oklahoma and orthodox neighbourhoods around New York City also report lower vaccination rates and higher rate of measles. The problem for public health experts is that measles, a highly contagious condition, doesn’t honour county borders. So these localised outbreaks tend to spread. “Measles outbreaks have been reported in multiple states, raising concerns about continued spread, increases in hospitalizations and deaths,” warns the Johns Hopkins tracker. As long as Trump and Kennedy are overseeing the national health apparatus, this situation seems unlikely to change. But how long will Kennedy keep his job at Health and Human Services?

The federal government’s health apparatus is seriously sceptical about vaccines



Recently revealed documents suggest that Kennedy lied to Congress during the hearings to confirm his appointment to HHS. Asked about a trip he made to Samoa, Kennedy declared that the visit had “nothing to do with vaccines”. But The Guardian and The Associated Press uncovered a letter Kennedy sent to Samoa’s prime minister before the trip, in which he states that his plan is to study the use of vaccines there. Kennedy has denied lying about that trip. But if Democrats take control of Congress in the November’s mid-term election, as expected, he could face serious problems holding on to his job. For now, though, the federal government’s health apparatus is seriously sceptical about vaccines. Many Americans are paying attention, and contagious disease is spreading. So here’s a bit of travel advice: If you’re planning a trip to the US anytime soon, make sure you’ve had all your jabs. 

Putin humiliated as Moscow hit by ‘cyber attack’ on election day and blames UK


 

Russia has accused the UK for originating the "cyber attacks" as the country gets into the final day of the election. The strikes took place on the final day of tightly controlled parliamentary elections, which are widely expected to deliver another victory for the ruling United Russia party, a key supporter of President Vladimir Putin.

The chair of Russia's Central Election Commission has insisted the country's parliamentary elections are still proceeding smoothly despite "cyber attacks". In comments carried by Tass news agency, Ella Pamfilova said attacks on the digital electronic voting system originated primarily from abroad, including Ukraine and the UK.

She added that more than 100 million "potentially harmful attacks on election resources" had been successfully blocked. This is the first time Russia has publicly named other countries it accuses of the attack.

On Saturday overnight, Moscow was hammered huge strikes from Ukraine - on the final day of voting in the 'sham' election.

More than 1,600 drones were downed by air defences in a Ukrainian onslaught that set the city's main oil refinery ablaze. A total of 450 were intercepted as they approached Moscow.

Three people have reportedly died in the incident. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said it was the largest-ever drone attack on Russia's capital.

Commenting on the overnight strikes, Sobyanin said: "This unprecedented attack was clearly planned to disrupt the elections. The enemy failed to achieve this. Since yesterday, more than 1,600 drones have been intercepted across all fronts. Of these, 450 were approaching Moscow."

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky praised the strikes, writing on X: "Our long-range responses had a very significant impact in the Moscow region last night."

He added: "One of Russia's key oil industry facilities and the aggressor's logistics facility were hit. These are billions of dollars that sustain the war machine."

Tucker Carlson claims Trump ordered Epstein files 'cover up'



Donald Trump “directly” ordered his administration to “cover up” millions of documents stemming from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein, according to the president’s now-former ally Tucker Carlson.

The right-wing media commentator told Vanity Fair that he urged the president in the summer of 2025 to release all the documents connected to the wealthy and well-connected sex offender, who died in prison in 2019, but Trump was not convinced.



“My position from the beginning with Trump, I said it to Trump, was, ‘I don’t understand why you would ever keep any of this stuff secret.’ And I got like a bunch of different answers,” Carlson, a former Fox News star, told Vanity Fair’s Chris Whipple.

“I don’t feel any need to cover for Epstein. So I said, ‘You shouldn’t either.’ In the end, it came from Trump directly,” he added.

Pressed by Whipple on what exactly came “directly” from the president, Carlson replied: “The order to cover it up came from Trump.”

“I asked him why. And he gave me this long, very emotional explanation that this was all a plot against him, like Russiagate,” he said.

After a protracted political battle with members of Congress who drew up legislation to compel the Department of Justice to publish the files, Trump reluctantly agreed to sign the measure into law late last year, kicking off an ongoing legal and political battle for a fuller picture of Epstein’s influence and alleged connections to a wider group of powerful figures who abused women and girls.



The president’s name appears thousands of times within the millions of documents released by the Justice Department under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Trump socialized with Epstein throughout the 1990s and 2000s, and Epstein who once described himself as the president’s “closest friend.”

Trump has not been accused of any criminal wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, and one’s appearance in the Epstein files does not suggest otherwise. The president has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein and insists he cut ties with the pedophile years before he was under investigation.

In response to questions about the president’s recollection of his conversation with Carlson about the Epstein files and whether Carlson was accurate, the White House directed The Independent to Trump’s lengthy Truth Social post from April that called him, among others, “stupid,” “NUT JOBS,” “TROUBLEMAKERS,” “Hand Flailing Fools” and “LOSERS.”

Trump said Carlson “couldn’t even finish College” and was “a broken man when he got fired from Fox, and he’s never been the same — Perhaps he should see a good psychiatrist!”

“Just as President Trump has said, he’s been totally exonerated on anything relating to Epstein,” White House spokeswoman Lauren Bis told The Independent.

“And by releasing thousands of pages of documents, cooperating with the House Oversight Committee’s subpoena request, signing the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and calling for more investigations into Epstein’s Democrat friends, President Trump has done more for Epstein’s victims than anyone before him,” she added.

In his profile of Vice President JD Vance, Whipple probes whether the second most powerful person in government is a craven political opportunist or a MAGA true believer eyeing the presidency.

Vance and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles appeared to agree that the Epstein files will remain a political liability in 2028 as the vice president looks to expand the “Trump coalition” by bringing in Republican voters who believe the administration failed them.

“The people inordinately interested in Epstein,” Wiles told Vanity Fair, “are the new members of the Trump coalition. It’s the Joe Rogan listeners. It’s the people that are sort of new to our world. It’s not the MAGA base.”

While the Trump administration has been eager to close the book on the Epstein case, bipartisan pressure to investigate people in his orbit — including the president — has only accelerated, with members of Congress issuing subpoenas for interviews with high-profile figures, former employees and administration officials.



The House Oversight Committee has also performed a series of interviews with survivors, whose testimony has led to criminal referrals to at least two people connected to Epstein.

Carlson, meanwhile, has publicly tried to distance himself from the president in the wake of the Iran war, which the former Fox News personality called a betrayal of the “America First” movement that Carlson championed.

He campaigned alongside Trump and urged him to select Vance as his running mate during the 2024 campaign, but he is now not “interested” in talking to the president at all and has suggested developing a viable third party to compete against Democrats and the GOP.


UCL study warns of safety risks in menopause supplements



Key nutrients missing: Half of menopause supplements studied lacked vitamin D and less than a quarter contained calcium, despite both being recommended for bone health.

Potential health hazards: Some products contain black cohosh, linked to liver toxicity, or excessive vitamin D, which can cause vomiting, confusion and organ damage.

Call for regulation: Researchers urge clinical trials and tighter oversight to curb misinformation and protect women from ineffective or harmful products.

UCL study flags safety risks in popular menopause supplements

University College London researchers analysed 201 menopause supplements from nine UK retailers, revealing wide variation in ingredients, doses and prices. Half lacked vitamin D and only 23.9% contained calcium, both recommended by menopause societies for bone health. Many products instead featured herbs, vitamins and phytoestrogens, with some botanicals such as black cohosh carrying known risks of liver toxicity, and excessive vitamin D intake posing potential for harmful calcium imbalances. 

Ingredient Type

Prevalence in Products

Common Examples

Potential Health Risks

Herbs

80%

Red clover, Sage

Some may carry liver toxicity (e.g., black cohosh)

Vitamins

77%

Vitamin B6

Excessive intake can cause high calcium levels, vomiting, confusion

Phytooestrogens

74%

Soy derivatives, Red clover

May affect hormone-sensitive conditions

Vitamin D

50%

Vitamin D3

Excessive intake can lead to high calcium levels and organ damage

Calcium

23.9%

Calcium carbonate

Deficiency may affect bone health; excessive intake can cause adverse effects.

Why these findings matter for millions of women

Around 13 million women in the UK are perimenopausal or menopausal, with about 80% experiencing symptoms like hot flushes, brain fog and mood changes. While hormone replacement therapy is the main treatment, many turn to supplements for relief, often influenced by marketing that is not backed by scientific evidence. The study warns that misinformation and high prices—up to £95 a month—could lead women to spend substantially on products with unproven benefits and possible health risks. 

Experts warn of 'menopause gold rush' fuelled by misinformation

Lead author Professor Joyce Harper described a 'menopause gold rush', with companies targeting mid‑life women and influencers promoting products without scientific backing. This trend risks spreading misinformation and diverting consumers from evidence‑based care. Experts note many active ingredients in menopause supplements are available in cheaper general multivitamins or herbal products, and that a balanced diet may provide similar nutritional benefits without the risks. The Independent +4

Recent cases and regulatory alerts highlight ongoing risks

Case reports, such as a suspected supplement‑induced eosinophilic ascites, and regulatory advisories on botanicals like ashwagandha and black cohosh, illustrate real‑world health risks. These range from rare but severe liver injury to gastrointestinal symptoms and potential drug interactions. Authorities advise stopping use and seeking medical attention if symptoms like jaundice, dark urine or unusual fatigue occur, underscoring the need for consumer vigilance and professional guidance.

Supplement

Reported Adverse Event

Population/Case

Regulatory/Guidance Notes

Black cohosh

Liver toxicity, jaundice, fatigue

Multiple cases including 52- and 54-year-old women

UK packaging warns to stop if liver symptoms appear; avoid in pregnancy and liver disease

Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera)

Liver injury, gastrointestinal symptoms

Reported in Australia and internationally; some hospitalizations

TGA advises stopping use if symptoms occur; very rare risk

Soy isoflavones

Abnormal uterine bleeding, uterine lining changes

High-dose intake (>40g/day) in postmenopausal women

Caution in hormone-sensitive conditions; moderate dietary intake considered safe

St. John’s Wort

Serotonin syndrome, drug interactions, dizziness

Included in some menopause formulas

Can interact with tamoxifen, blood thinners, contraceptives; monitor closely

Red ginseng

Vaginal bleeding

Postmenopausal women in clinical studies

Monitor for unexpected bleeding; evaluate for serious conditions.


Common pesticide found to cause hidden brain damage




 Chlorpyrifos, a chlorinated organophosphate (CPF), is among the most widely used insecticides worldwide. In the United States, it remains a fixture in agriculture, showing up in nonorganic fruits, vegetables, grains, and even in the air and dust near farm fields, despite a ban on residential use since 2001. Globally, its use continues at scale.

Now, researchers at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health have uncovered troubling evidence: prenatal exposure to chlorpyrifos is linked to measurable changes in brain structure and reduced motor skills in children and teens growing up in New York City.

As scientists uncover the hidden costs of this everyday chemical, the focus shifts from what’s on our plates to what’s affecting the future health of our children.

A 1960s pesticide icon

Chlorpyrifos (CPF) was introduced in 1965 by Dow Chemical and quickly became one of the most widely used pesticides in agriculture. Valued for its ability to kill insects on crops like corn, soybeans, and fruit, it was also sprayed in homes and schools for decades.

From farming staple to public health concern

Its popularity spread rapidly thanks to its effectiveness and low cost, making it a staple of modern farming. But as research advanced, scientists began linking long-term exposure to serious health risks, especially in children.

Hidden health risks

A number of studies soon revealed that CPF exposure can harm the brain and nervous system, leading to lower IQ, developmental delays, and behavioral problems in children, even at low levels over time.

Uncovering the hidden impact of CPF

And now, a groundbreaking study led by Columbia University, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, and USC’s Keck School of Medicine is the first to show that prenatal exposure to CPF leaves lasting molecular and metabolic changes in the human brain.

How CPF travels through the body

When pesticides enter our bodies through food, touch, or air, pregnant women face a unique risk: CPF can cross the placenta, reaching the fetus at up to four times the levels found in maternal tissues, and then penetrate the developing brain.

What animal studies tell us about pesticides

Animal studies reveal that even low-level exposure to CPF and similar pesticides, below the dose that harms insects, can disrupt brain development. 

What animal studies tell us about pesticides

In rodents, it hinders neuron growth, interferes with synapse formation, and even triggers cell death.

What CPF does to the brain

Early exposure to CPF appears especially harmful to glial cells, the brain’s support network. Studies show it first triggers abnormal growth and swelling, and later leads to widespread scarring known as astrogliosis.

The brain’s “support crew”

While neurons handle the electrical signals that let us think, move, and feel, glial cells keep everything running smoothly. They nourish neurons, clear away waste, and help repair damage. Think of them as the maintenance team that keeps the brain’s communication network in top shape.

What is astrogliosis?

Astrogliosis, a type of scarring in the brain that may result from early exposure to CPF, occurs when glial cells swell and multiply, forming a dense web of tissue. While this response is meant to protect the brain, excessive scarring can disrupt healthy function.

How CPF disrupts the brain at a cellular level

Researchers say CPF harms the brain by sparking stress inside cells, fueling inflammation, disrupting energy production in mitochondria, and altering how brain cells respond to growth signals.

Tracking CPF exposure

The study tracked 270 children from the Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health birth cohort. All were born in New York City to Latino and African-American mothers, offering a deeper look at the communities most often exposed to environmental risks.

Chemicals at birth, effects years later

Every child in the study showed traces of CPF in their umbilical cord blood at birth. Years later, between ages six and 14, researchers followed up with brain scans and behavioral tests to track possible impacts.

Exposure leaves its mark

The findings revealed a distinct trend: children exposed to higher levels of the insecticide before birth showed more significant changes in both brain structure and function compared to their peers.

How early exposure shapes the brain

Building on earlier evidence that prenatal CPF exposure can disrupt skills like intelligence, focus, and socialization, researchers predicted strong links to brain regions tied to these abilities.

Dose matters in brain impact

Prenatal exposure to CPF was found to alter brain structure, function, and even metabolism. The higher the exposure, the greater the disruption, pointing to a clear dose-response effect.

Farm use persists

For this group of children, indoor pesticide use was the primary source of exposure. While the EPA banned chlorpyrifos in households back in 2001, the chemical is still widely used in farming, especially on non-organic produce and grains.

A decline after the ban

After the household ban, CPF exposure steadily fell. Products were pulled from shelves, leftover supplies ran out, and carbamate-based pesticides largely took their place in American homes.

Exposure beyond the home

But even with the household ban in place, farm workers and nearby communities remain at risk. Ongoing agricultural use means CPF can drift into the air and dust, leaving those close to fields exposed.

Air pollution shows a parallel story

Earlier work with this same group of children revealed nearly identical results tied to prenatal exposure to air pollution, reinforcing the idea that environmental factors can also shape brain development from the very beginning.

CPF’s unique impact

The study shows CPF affects the brain on its own. Its influence didn’t overlap with air pollution, and the results stayed the same even after factoring in other pollutants.

A common pathway of harm

Even though these chemicals are different, many harm the brain in similar ways. Studies show that inflammation and cell damage are key, whether the exposure comes from CPF pesticides, air pollution (PM2.5), or pollutants from burning fuels (PAHs).

Protecting the most vulnerable

Virginia Rauh, ScD, senior author of the study, warns that current exposure levels still endanger farm workers, pregnant women, and unborn children. She stresses the need to closely monitor vulnerable groups, especially expectant mothers in farming communities, since their infants remain at risk.

Caution across pesticides

Other organophosphate pesticides may cause similar harm, making it crucial to limit exposure during pregnancy, infancy, and early childhood, times when the brain grows quickly and is most vulnerable to toxic chemicals.

Study scope and limitations

There are some limitations to the study. With participants drawn from urban Dominican and African-American mothers and their children, the results might not represent experiences in other communities or regions.

Addressing potential selection bias

Some selection bias was possible, since not all cohort members were reached or agreed to MRI scans. Still, participants were similar to the full group in demographics and long-term cognitive outcomes, so bias appears limited.

Risks may outweigh benefits

There's no doubt: pesticides such as CPF may boost crop yields, but mounting evidence shows they can damage brain development, harm wildlife, and contaminate soil and water, posing risks far beyond the fields.

Safer farming practices take root

Fortunately, farmers are slowly embracing integrated pest management, crop rotation, and natural predators to fight pests. These revolutionary methods cut back on chemicals while safeguarding harvests, proving that healthier farming is achievable close to home.

Farming for a sustainable tomorrow

Farmers worldwide are testing organic practices, biopesticides, and precision tools. By blending natural solutions with modern technology, they’re paving the way toward cleaner water, healthier food, and a future built on sustainability.

Tim Spector says simple tweak in your cooking can 'slash cholesterol'

 



A leading health guru has revealed that spending just 10 minutes on one simple kitchen trick before cooking could dramatically cut cholesterol levels and slash your risk of heart disease. Professor Tim Spector, who is one of the founders of the ZOE diet app who became a household name during the Covid pandemic, has shared his game-changing advice for anyone using chopped onion and garlic in their cooking.

The expert insists that letting these ingredients sit for 10 minutes before they hit the heat can supercharge levels of a powerful chemical that tackles cholesterol head-on. Speaking to The i, Prof Spector explained how this straightforward technique also helps keep blood sugar levels steady.

The professor's guidance forms part of his top dietary tips, where he highlighted: "Onion and garlic, as well as cabbage and broccoli, are good sources of sulforaphane, a chemical that has been shown to improve glucose control and cholesterol levels."

He explained that the cooking process wipes out an enzyme called mirosinase, which is crucial for producing sulforaphane. But by giving vegetables a five to 10-minute breather before cooking, the sulforaphane gets "activated" and survives the heat treatment.

Prof Spector also dished out another clever meal-planning strategy, revealing: "There is emerging evidence that eating salads or other vegetables as starters ten minutes or so before you have a carbohydrate-rich meal can help to keep you fuller for longer and reduce blood sugar spikes from the starchy food."

The diet expert also recommended Brits incorporate more fermented foods into their diets, such as kimchi. He praised vinegar for its role in salad dressings, explaining that its acidity helps stabilise blood sugar levels, keeping you feeling satisfied between meals and reducing the temptation to snack.

Other tips included swapping processed stock cubes for miso paste and cooking tomatoes in extra-virgin olive oil to extract more nutrients. Prof Spector shared his personal preference: "I drizzle and spread extra virgin olive oil on my toast rather than butter, for greater health benefits. This is what they do in Spain, and it tastes delicious."

He suggested a healthier breakfast alternative: "Instead of quickly reaching for cereal, have full-fat Greek yoghurt topped with nuts, seeds, and berries. It contains less sugar, and the toppings will help you reach your 30 plants a week. Research shows people who eat 30 different plants a week tend to have a more diverse gut microbiome than those who eat 10. A flourishing microbiome can help the body fight infections, reduce the risk of autoimmune disease, and regulate appetite and body weight.

"Eating the rainbow not only supports your gut health and reduces the risk of disease, it also enriches your diet with a greater range of flavours and textures (and will help you reach your 30 plants a week target too). A simple and cheap way is to buy pre-mixed combinations; packs of multi-coloured peppers are a good example, as are combinations of other root vegetables, or mixed nuts and seeds."

Shocking pictures show pale and gaunt Putin as Kremlin has 'no plan for his death'




 Grim new images of a pale, gaunt Vladimir Putin have fuelled fresh health rumours, exposing a far more dangerous truth: the Kremlin has no plan for his death. The 73-year-old president appears markedly thinner and drained in recent photographs, including one showing him meeting election chief Ella Pamfilova in Moscow.

The pictures have reignited speculation about Putin's physical condition after years of swirling rumours. Yet the greater crisis, according to a leading Russia expert, is political. Dr Julian G Waller, a research scientist in Russian studies at the Centre for Naval Analyses, warns in Foreign Affairs that Putin has deliberately built a system with no succession mechanism, writing: "Putin will eventually leave office, whether by death, illness, or - against all observable inclinations - stepping aside. But what happens then is unclear."

The absence of any clear handover arrangements risks plunging Russia into chaos. Dr Waller outlines several grim possibilities: a rushed and contested transfer of power, a chaotic struggle among elites long denied the top job, or continued decay under the ageing clique that currently surrounds the dictator.

Unlike other post-Soviet leaders who prepared family successors or formal rules, Putin has sent no such signals. He clings to power while surrounding himself with a tight circle of elderly loyalists.

Constitutionally, Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin would assume temporary control if Putin dies or becomes incapacitated. However, Dr Waller notes that Mishustin lacks an independent power base and would struggle to convert caretaker status into permanent authority.

Real influence, the expert argues, would instead fall to a "shadowy mob" of Putin's oldest allies - men in their seventies who form the regime's security backbone.

They include spy chief Alexander Bortnikov, 74; National Guard head Viktor Zolotov, 72; Security Council secretary Sergei Shoigu, 71; and General Valery Gerasimov, 70. These figures have spent decades blocking younger talent from rising, creating a dangerous bottleneck of frustrated subordinates with little governing experience.

Dr Waller said: "Long-obstructed subordinates, lacking governing experience, will be thrust into these roles - or the sudden vacancy will spur a scramble among discontented insiders who will want to muscle each other out of the way. This is a recipe for potential chaos and could lead to dangerous missteps during the careful dance of coordinating a leadership transition."

The warning comes as Russia remains locked in a grinding war in Ukraine and faces mounting economic pressure. Any sudden leadership vacuum could trigger not only elite infighting but also wider instability, including risks of miscalculation with the West.

Putin has ruled Russia for more than two decades, systematically dismantling independent institutions and personalising power. The result, Dr Waller concluded, is a regime uniquely unprepared for the inevitable. The pale, gaunt figure now appearing in official photographs serves as a stark visual reminder that time is running out - and that the Kremlin has done nothing to prepare for the day it arrives.

With no designated heir and an ageing elite clinging to the levers of power, Russia stands on the brink of a potentially explosive transition. The pictures of Putin may shock, but the absence of any plan for his death is the real alarm.

Former Russian commander offers grim assessment of Putin's strategy




 Scary plans

Since the onset of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, the majority of direct conflict has occurred within Ukraine. However, the ramifications of this war extend well beyond the immediate combat zones. With major international players such as China, North Korea, the European Union, and the United States escalating their involvement, the situation has become markedly more complex. This deepening global engagement has clouded the conflict's trajectory, rendering its future outcomes increasingly unpredictable.

Leaked documents give insight into Putin's plans

The world watches with apprehension, asking the question no one wants answered: if Moscow were to push the war westward, which cities would fall within its crosshairs first?

'Big colossal war'

You might never have heard of Russian lawmaker Andrey Gurulyov. However, the retired general, who currently serves as a deputy in the Russian legislature, claims Russia is arming up for a “big colossal war”.

In case of a new world war...

On July 24, 2024, Gurulyov spoke on the state-run channel Russia-1 about what would be Putin’s targets in the case of a new World War.

Escalation

Sky News highlighted that Gurulyov, a deputy of the State Duma and member of the legislature’s defense committee, speculated this global conflict might result from the escalation of a blockade on Kaliningrad.

A little bit of Russia in the Baltic

Kaliningrad is a Russian port enclave in the Baltic, between the NATO countries of Poland and Lithuania. This makes communications and supply a tricky matter, to say the least.

The Suvalkovksy Corridor

Experts wondered if Russia should try to create a corridor, dubbed the Suvalkovsky Corridor, to connect Kaliningrad with the rest of the country.

Russian troops and NATO armies

The retired general, according to The Sun, argued that this was a trap that would surround Russian troops with enemy armies. However, actions should be taken if NATO blockades Kaliningrad.

Star wars

The first logical step, according to Gurulyov, would be disabling the enemy’s satellite system.

'We would see them all as NATO'

“No one would care if they are American or British. We would see them all as NATO”, comments Gurulyov, as quoted by The Daily Mail.

Anti-missile attack

Secondly, mitigate the enemy’s anti-missile system “everywhere and 100%”, added Gurulyov.

Target: London

“We certainly wouldn’t start with Paris, Warsaw or Berlin”, said Gurulyov to the reporters of Russia-1. “The first hit would be London. It's crystal clear that the threat to the world comes from the Anglo-Saxons”.

Disabling Europe

“As part of the operation to destroy critically important sites, Western Europe will be cut off from power supplies and immobilized”, declared the former military officer. The Sun points out that, like many other Russian hardliners, Gurulyov believes the European Union is too soft to engage in an actual war.

America joins the room

Gurulyov speculated on how the United States would manage to keep Europe fighting without food or power and how long Washington, D.C. would manage to avoid conflict.

Some assembly required

“This is the rough plan”, Gurulyov declared, adding that “I deliberately leave out certain moments because they are not to be discussed on TV”.

Russia's hit list

In another TV program, the retired general enumerated the possible countries that Russia might be forced to engage next: Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania.

Armchair general?

Keep in mind that although Gurulyov serves as a deputy in the State Duma (pictured) and is part of the legislature’s defense committee, as The Daily Mail highlights, he no longer is an active member of the military. His statements should be taken with a grain of salt.

More questions than answers

However, his closeness with Russian President Vladimir Putin and his inner circle earned him sanctions from the United States. So there’s much to speculate about how much Andrey Gurulyov knows and how much he wants us to believe.


The real situation of Russia's economy

 


Warnings emerge from Western analysts claiming that Russia’s economy is teetering on the brink of collapse. Allegations that the Kremlin is manipulating official data, combined with international sanctions, inflation, and underperforming debt, have raised serious concerns. While it's clear Russia is under pressure, some economists argue that signs of a full-blown implosion remain inconclusive.

Russia's assault on Ukraine

In 2026, the world marked the fourth year of Russia’s assault on Ukraine. With Trump’s return to office, Ukraine is concerned about its support from the American government as the new administration seeks to end the conflict as soon as possible.

Oil and gas exports

Russia’s resilient and strong economy, particularly its oil and gas exports, has consistently been referenced as a point that allows the nation to remain in an advantageous position.

Is Russia's economy really stable?

Russia gives the impression that there is no bottom to its financial means. But is this true? Is Russia-s economy really the stable horse that it paints itself to be? Historian and economist Adam Tooze provides an overview of the arguments that are driving narratives about Russia's economy and the impact on war efforts.

Economic data

In November 2024, the Financial Times published a piece that questioned the economic data coming out of Russia. A subsequent article doubled down on this argument, casting greater doubt on the numbers.

Corporate borrowing

Global financial analyst Craig Kennedy, a leading expert on Russian economics, published data demonstrating how Russia has been conducting a great deal of corporate borrowing.

Subsidized loans

What does corporate borrowing mean? Essentially, these are loans that are provided at subsidized rates. This kind of activity allows nations to access financing for their war activities through legal means.

Keep up financing

Russian President Vladimir Putin has consistently referenced his nation’s capacity to keep up financing for its war efforts, almost indefinitely.

Time is on his side

In his January 2025 Financial Times article, Martin Sandbu argues that Putin continues to reiterate to Ukraine’s allies that “time is on his side.” 

What’s the point of Putin's comments?

Putin wants to impress on the West more broadly that the only way to end the war between Russia and Ukraine is to concede to his will.

Misinformation

Pundits reduce many of Putin’s comments to misinformation. Some argue that Putin is merely driving a rhetoric to distort the pressure the nation is facing. Let’s look at some analytical perspectives.

Government officials

Sandbu references comments issued by Russian officials who are starting to feel the heat of Russia’s war efforts in their pockets. For example, Rostec (state defense) Chief Executive, Sergei Chemezov (pictured), stated that high credit rates were destroying his weapons exports activities.

More fragile

Analysts argue that the situation must be serious for Chemezov to speak publicly on the matter. It likely means that the picture that Putin paints of a financially stable and materially rich war effort is likely much more fragile than he states.

Debt

This concern is well reflected in Kennedy’s 2025 report, which notes a spike in Russian corporate debt. According to the report, the debt rate has increased by 71% just since 2022; a significant spike.

Lending

Russian banks are lending companies that are critical to government interests and services credit that is issued at below-market rates.

Money printing

Another way to see what’s happening, according to Sandbu, is that Russia is “engaged in massive money printing,” perhaps amounting to 20% of Russia’s overall output in 2023.

What does this do in a practical sense?

According to Tooze, some of the very real impacts on the Russian economy include: high inflation rates (official data puts inflation at 6%, but it’s likely much higher), reduction of diverse investment and borrowing options, and mounting debts (even worse—underperforming debts).

Sanctions

Coupled with increased sanctions that hit the Russian government at the tail end of 2024, Russia is certainly facing greater turmoil than it is letting on.

Ruble facing challenges

As of 2026, the Russian currency, the ruble, is facing new challenges with its value dropping. The ruble regained some strength after a drastic dip in 2023, but it is now seeing fluctuations and is expected to continue facing challenges throughout 2026. With limited options to stabilize the currency due to ongoing sanctions, Russia is now navigating a complex economic landscape.

How bad are things?

The risks Russia is taking on are certainly significant. Without the means to reign things in, perceptions of a stable Russian economy are deteriorating. But how bad is the actual situation?

Difficult answer

The key question remains: How strong is the Russian economy? The answer to which is, as highlighted by Tooze, difficult to pin down. 

Keynesian war economy

Tooze highlights how Russia responded to Western sanctions and the financial pressures of war by taking on what's called a “Keynesian war economy.” This just means that the economy is controlled by the government to make sure there are adequate resources to spend on war efforts.

Preventing the economy from collapse

Weapons, supplies, and soldiers, among other things, are all given a boost in spending to push the economy forward. Essentially, it allows for money to keep circulating, people to maintain employment, and prevents the economy from falling apart.

Underreporting spending

While Russia only claims to be spending eight percent of its budget on defense, this is likely, as noted by Kennedy and Sandbu, a grave underestimation. War efforts are not only likely being underreported, but they are certainly beyond the scope of public budgets.

Energy prices up

By boosting its energy prices in response to the pressures of international sanctions, Russia is also raking in high revenues from energy exports.

Production of weapons

A 2024 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace report highlights how Russia has significantly increased its production of weapons, including armored vehicles and military drones (pictured are fragments of a Russian-modified Molniya-2 drone).

Financial incentives for new recruits

Requiring tens of thousands of additional soldiers every month, Russia has also used a great deal of financial incentives to attract more enlistments, issuing heavy payouts.

Generating interest

As the war drags on, potential recruits are losing their eagerness to join the frontlines. Russia has even expanded soldier benefits benefits to include strategies that the American army sometimes uses, such as debt forgiveness and guaranteed compensation for deceased soldiers, among others. Pictured is a bus carrying Russian naval cadets.

Russia's ability to offset challenges

There is no doubt that sanctions have placed a great deal of pressure on the Russian economy, but the nation’s response has also been able to offset many of the challenges Western analysts claim to be crippling the Russian state.

Unemployment rates

Unemployment rates in Russia are just over 2%, as the nation continues to demand more workers to fulfill its needs. Household income is, too, increasing. Some of the nation’s poorest have seen an increase of nearly two-thirds since 2022 alone.

Is an implosion coming?

Is Russia’s economic growth stable? Is it as resilient as it seems or is it facing an implosion, as some analysts argue? Tooze points to the masterful capacity of the Russian government to deal with the fallout of the 2008 financial crisis.

How will this unfold?

With fewer risks today than in 2008, it seems that the nation knows what it’s doing in terms of balancing potential crises. At worst, its economy may be currently facing some sort of stagnation. How long can its economy continue in this format? This is what has yet to be seen.


Working from home linked to rising mental health problems, study finds

 Never made it back to the office after Covid? It could be taking a hidden toll on your wellbeing.



A new study suggests the shift from office working to working from home is linked to rising levels of psychological distress - with those living alone hit hardest.

Researchers found that employees in jobs that became more remote after the pandemic experienced a rise in mental health problems, compared with those who continued working on-site.

The study, published in the journal Science, analysed data from 588,322 people across five large US surveys conducted between 2011 and 2024 - excluding peak Covid years to avoid skewed results.

Experts compared healthcare use, including mental health treatment and antidepressant prescriptions, between workers in remote-friendly roles and those whose jobs required in-person attendance.

They found that people generally reported greater meaning in their work when it involved social interaction - something often missing in home-based roles.

Workers in remote jobs showed a small but notable rise in psychological distress in the years following the pandemic.

And the impact was significantly worse for those living alone, who experienced nearly double the increase in distress compared with people living with others.

Importantly, there was no corresponding rise in non-mental healthcare use - suggesting the trend was not simply due to people seeking more medical help overall.

The researchers estimated that the rise in remote work accounts for around one-third of the overall increase in psychological distress seen over the study period.

‘Remote work may therefore be considered a significant, but not the sole, contributor,’ the authors said.

They warned that while working from home can eliminate commuting and offer flexibility, it may also remove the everyday social interactions that help support emotional wellbeing.

‘Small daily interactions with coworkers - and even brief moments such as greeting a barista - may play an important role in maintaining mental health,’ they added.

Those living alone may be particularly vulnerable, as remote working can heighten feelings of isolation and reduce opportunities for social contact.

However, the researchers noted some limitations, including that the data focused solely on US workers and could not fully distinguish between fully remote and hybrid work patterns.

Data published in March also revealed there are 850,000 more people either receiving treatment or waiting to start care compared with January 2020.

Responding to the surge, Mark Rowland, chief executive of the Mental Health Foundation, warned: ‘This is a human and economic catastrophe, costing the UK at least £118 billion a year.

‘Without an effective, co-ordinated “invest to save” approach, the mental health crisis will only get worse.’

A previous Norwegian study found people working from home more than 15 hours a week were more likely to drink alcohol than office-based colleagues.

Meanwhile, a 2021 survey by US recovery firm Sierra Tucson found one in five workers admitted using alcohol or drugs while working from home. 

Far worse than feared? US economy loses 60,000 hospitality jobs in huge blow to Trump




 The US economy added just 57,000 jobs in June, according to the latest employment report, with a shock loss of 61,000 hospitality jobs nationwide that has handed Donald Trump an awkward economic setback months before the World Cup and the America 250 celebrations are meant to turbocharge hiring.

Hiring in the US had been expected to remain relatively solid as inflation cooled and major global sporting events loomed. Analysts at FactSet forecast around 100,000 new jobs last month, while Goldman Sachs suggested the World Cup alone might swell payrolls by 40,000 positions. Instead, the headline jobs figure came in barely above half the prediction, and the hospitality sector, which should be gearing up for a tourism boom, went into reverse.



The overall unemployment rate in June was reported at 4.2%, a marginal improvement on May's 4.3%, but the stronger-looking rate masks what is happening under the bonnet of the labour market. The labour force participation rate slipped 0.3 percentage points to 61.5%, its lowest level since March 2021, signalling that fewer Americans are either in work or actively looking for it. Household employment tumbled by 507,000, meaning more than half a million fewer people told survey takers they had a job.

Economists often warn that a falling unemployment rate can sometimes be the wrong kind of good news. Here, the drop is tied to people exiting the workforce, not to an economy pulling jobseekers into work. That nuance is likely to feature heavily in the political spin war, not least for a Trump campaign that has staked its appeal on restoring what it casts as stronger, more 'American' jobs growth.

Hospitality Jobs Slump Exposes World Cup Hopes

The hospitality jobs collapse stands out. According to the data, accommodation and food services shed 61,000 jobs in June, a brutal reversal at a time when seasonal hiring is usually ramping up. Officials said the figures reflected slower-than-usual summer recruitment, a worrying sign given that the US is preparing to host the World Cup and gearing up for the America 250 commemorations of the country's founding.

Goldman Sachs had previously argued that the World Cup could lift payrolls by about 40,000 positions. On the face of it, the loss of 61,000 hospitality jobs suggests those hopes have hit a wall, or at least been delayed. It remains unclear from the latest data whether any of the forecast World Cup boost has yet materialised, and the report does not spell it out. IBTimes UK could not independently verify whether the Goldman prediction came true, so that should be taken with a grain of salt.



Other sectors did grow, albeit not enough to offset hospitality's slide. Professional and business services added 36,000 jobs, the largest single gain. Social assistance roles increased by 25,000, and healthcare posted a 22,000 gain, which was described as slower than its typically robust pace. Government-linked employment rose by 8,000.

CNBC reported that average hourly earnings ticked up 0.3% over the month and 3.5% year on year, figures that were broadly in line with consensus forecasts. That kind of steady wage growth, paired with weaker hiring, will not make the US Federal Reserve's life any easier as it tries to judge whether inflationary pressures have really cooled or are just lurking in the background.

Trump's Boasts Undermined By Grim Jobs Reality

The hospitality jobs plunge is politically awkward for Trump because it fits a pattern that undercuts his central claim of superior economic stewardship. Earlier this year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics revised its figures and concluded that job growth under Trump had been significantly weaker than initially reported.

According to that revised report, instead of the 584,000 jobs that had been expected, an average of 49,000 a month, the US economy added only 181,000 jobs last year of his term, around 15,000 a month on average. That is not just a rounding error. It transforms what his allies presented as a resilient labour market into something distinctly anaemic.



Trumpworld tried to get ahead of the bad news. In February, senior trade and manufacturing counsellor Peter Navarro appeared on Fox News' 'Mornings with Maria' to warn that the upcoming jobs report would be lower than usual. Navarro told viewers: 'The jobs report's going to come out tomorrow. We have to revise our expectations down significantly for what a monthly job number should look like.'

He then rolled out a sprawling explanation centred on immigration, claiming that when the US was 'letting in 2 million illegal aliens' it had to generate 200,000 jobs a month to maintain a steady state. Navarro alleged that during Joe Biden's presidency, 'all of the jobs that we were creating in Biden's years were going to illegals' and that 'Americans were going to the unemployment lines.'



He went further, insisting that Wall Street would need to adjust to a new normal because the Trump administration was deporting 'millions of illegals out of our job market.' Yet when host Maria Bartiromo pressed him on whether he was expecting weak numbers, Navarro insisted: 'Not expecting a weak number. I'm just saying that going forward, when we see a number under 100,000, we don't wring our hands.'

The problem now is that US hiring has fallen to 57,000 and hospitality has lost 61,000 jobs even as Trump is back on the political stage presenting himself as a jobs president. If sub‑100,000 monthly gains are, in Navarro's view, nothing to fuss about, voters staring at shuttered bars or cancelled shifts in hotels might beg to differ.

The broader backdrop is hardly gentle. Inflation and global conflict have created a twitchy environment for employers, who appear to be pulling back despite major events on the horizon that should, in theory, be good for business. The labour force participation slide hints at workers who are discouraged, retired early, or juggling unpaid care. Some may well return as World Cup construction and tourism demand kick in, but there is no guarantee. The hospitality numbers show how quickly those hopes can turn to smoke.

For now, the data leave the Trump camp in an odd position. They want credit for any good economic headline and a pass on anything ugly. The June report, particularly the loss of 60,000 plus hospitality jobs, makes that a much harder sell.

Shocking new figures show why Keir Starmer has the worst record of any prime minister

 


More than 76,000 small boat migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel during Sir Keir Starmer's tenure in No 10 - a higher number than under any other prime minister. New figures exposed Labour's failure to control our borders, as Sir Keir marked his second anniversary as Prime Minister.

He entered Downing Street on July 5, 2024, the day after the General Election, and delivered a triumphant speech promising "secure borders" as part of a mission to "rebuild Britain". But as Sir Keir prepares to make way for incoming prime minister Andy Burnham, Conservatives accused him of presiding over "a disastrous two years". Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: "Far from smashing the gangs, smuggling bosses are living openly in the UK and are claiming asylum.



"Labour have been a disaster in two years, and as the prospect of Andy Burnham rears its head over the horizon, there is little chance the situation will improve."

Official figures show 76,598 illegal immigrants crossed the Channel since July 4, 2024, an average of 105 every day.

Labour has also released an estimated 82,000 offenders early, after serving 40% of their sentence rather than 50%, under an emergency scheme to reduce prison overcrowding called SDS40, introduced in September 2024. It meant 113 prisoners a day were freed early for every day Sir Keir has run the country.

Nick Timothy, Shadow Justice Secretary, said: "It is a betrayal of victims, many of whom have not been properly informed about the release of those who have committed crimes against them."



More than 500,000 Brits are also believed to have fled the country while Sir Keir was Prime Minister, according to a dossier published by Conservatives. It showed 251,000 British nationals emigrated from the UK in the first 12 months of the Labour Government, suggesting 502,000 British nationals will have left the country over the two-year period.

But Labour paid tribute to Sir Keir on the anniversary of his premiership. Anna Turley MP, chairwoman of the Labour Party, said: "The decisions we have taken have not always been easy, and we know there's much more to do, but Labour will always do what is in the best interests of the British people.

"Today, the economy is growing, wages are rising, NHS waiting lists are falling, immigration is down, and Britain is moving forward once again.

"The most basic responsibility of any prime minister is to leave the country in a better state to which you found it. Keir Starmer can proudly say he will do just that."

In an interview this week, Sir Keir said he would "do everything I possibly can" to help Andy Burnham win the next election.

But he admitted: "Did I want it to end at this point in this way? No, I didn't.

"But I accept that with good grace."